With a long
week of writers block from someone who is far from ever having the sheer
insanity, paranoia, insomnia, and occasional chain smoking of a true writer, am
now back at it, really pumping out a pile of refuse that one would call a blog
(I do not, nor ever will consider myself to have those traits listed above to
call myself a writer.) I just had a hard time getting back at it, maybe because
of laziness, procrastination, or a hellish work week (with a side of GTA 5) I
am giving this blog a mighty dose of bullshit. Thanks for giving this a chance,
but seriously, set the bar extremely low this time around.
Why are some countries or regions
better at doing some things than other countries or regions?
I
think, and mind you this is personal opinion and thought, that now that with a
flattened world, and a level playing field, that more countries have been
forced to be more competitive to stay relevant in a large world market. If I had
to compare with Friedman’s words and his talks about Mexico, it just makes
sense. Look at China, huge world population, and a culture with a severe
attention to detail. Compare that to the U.S. we have our own automated culture,
electronics and videogames, it is just hard to keep up with those kind of
cultures and countries who are in a situation where they have to pay attention
to such detail on manufacturing and of course to earn their pay they pump units
out faster and more efficient with their large population working for every
dollar they can earn. The U.S. has a better business relationship with China
rather than Mexico just for that reason. Even if you compare the engineering
aspect of India and the large rise of those outsourced jobs, you have to
consider that in a flat world, sometimes the more dedicated worker gets the leg
up in competition with other countries, and that just comes down to pure
dedication, or a culture that strives on that dedication to remain competitive in
the rest of the market. So, in retrospect I would say it is just that, some
countries just have that edge, with a government, or a culture, or an economy
that demands that dedication to stay competitive with other countries.
What are self-directed consumers?
Are you a self-directed consumer?
A
self-directed consumer is someone who does their own research before purchase
of product, among other things, that is pretty much it. Yes, I do find myself a
self-directed consumer, largely with the help of the internet I have a huge
advantage and convenience to access that data at my fingertips. I research on
electronics and other technologies that interest me from time to time even if I
lack the means to purchase such equipment. Example, I hate my phone, the
battery life is horrid and I am pretty sick of charging it up to three times a
day. I think it is time for a new phone but I cannot upgrade until the end of
my contract in May 2014. So, I explore my options and notice some of the top
phones in reader reviews or you tube just to make my choice or at least narrow
down choices even though I am not in the position to purchase a phone without
contract for somewhere up to $600 dollars, or in some cases more. So, as I look
through my options I see that I could purchase a used phone, they are
guaranteed but they are fairly dated and I just do not want to run into the
same deal with my current phone, plus being a big geek like myself, I have to
have the latest and greatest. I did enough research to determine that either I
wait to the end of my contract and buy the top product of that time, or I see
reports and rumors of the google nexus 5 due to be announced at the end of the
month, and I can purchase that phone at the same price as if I was to wait and
purchase a quality contract handset device.
Does globalization mean
Americanization?
No,
well yes? Seriously I feel like this is a hard question to answer, America is a
very large market that just about every country is pushing to stay in business
with. Outsourcing, manufacturing, etc. From what I have read, and to my
understanding, to distinguish the line between globalization and
Americanization is this: you look at how countries are competing to stay
relevant in a dominant U.S. market, so with China as an example, they do their
American research in order to create products that are relevant to our culture.
So I imagine they watch our pop culture and see Miley Cyrus twerking with her tongue
out and probably think “WTFuck?” I don’t blame them if they do, in fact I see
some of their culture and think the same. But, if they want to stay in our
market sometimes it is wise to shrug your shoulders and create a product that
the consumer wants. So yes, in a way it can be considered Americanization, but
if I was to consider a different country as being a world leader other than the
United States, would I call that Arabicization? I say that without trying to
make up an offensive word for anyone. But considering the massive growth of
Dubai over the last two decades it’s not hard to think that it would be a
definite possibility pending political mishaps, and unwinnable wars, that we
may not be at the top of the economic food chain, and the deciding factor in
Globalization forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment